payday

  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
IGF 2012 Baku, Azerbaijan
Workshop Evaluation Survey
1. Please select your workshop number*

2. Did the workshop organizers clearly explain the objectives of the workshop?*
PoorFairGoodExcellent

3. Did the workshop follow the principle of balanced geographic representation among panelists?*
PoorFairGoodExcellent

4. Did the workshop follow the principle of multistakeholder representation among panelists?*
PoorFairGoodExcellent

5. Did the workshop follow the principle of gender balance among panelists?*
PoorFairGoodExcellent

6. Level of interactive discussions between panelists and participants.*
PoorFairGoodExcellent

7. Relevance of the workshop to Internet governance issues, in particular to the main theme and subthemes of the 2012 meeting.*
PoorFairGoodExcellent

8. Inclusion of remote participants into the discussions.*
PoorFairGoodExcellent

9. Overall, how would you evaluate the quality of this workshop?*
PoorFairGoodExcellent

9. Where the panelists adequately prepared?*
PoorFairGoodExcellent

10. Please provide your comments regarding the content and format of the workshop (e.g. what was the most valuable aspect of the workshop? What could have been done to improve the workshop?)

11. Please choose your stake holder group*

12. Please choose your gender*
MaleFemale

13. Please select your region*
AfricaAsia PacificEastern EuropeLatin America and Caribbean (GRULAC)Western European and Others Group (WEOG)